June 2, 2012

Negative reviews, or I am often a terrible person.

I've written this post in my head a thousand times. It doesn't make it sound any better. So I'm just going to come right out and say the things that are on my mind:

I write negative reviews. A lot of them, actually. And I don't plan on stopping anytime soon.

I'm proud of my negative reviews. I think that the widespread, responsible, intelligent criticism of literature--even the literature that so many people consider fluff, like YA--is one of the most fantastic things to come out of the book blogging boom. But sometimes...

...I feel like a terrible person.
 
The downside to the book blogging world--especially the YA book blogging world--is that it has brought authors, readers, agents, editors, publicists, cover designers, and the zillion other people involved in the book biz and thrown them all together on the playground. There are authors whose books I hate, but whose blogs I love. There are authors whose books I've loved, but hated their online presence so much I've felt guilty for enjoying their stories. The publicity machine that churns out hotly buzzed title after hotly buzzed title makes it difficult to go against the grain.

Negative reviews get a lot of attention, and maybe not the good kind. 

It kills me that the most vitriolic, bitter, and frankly nasty review I have ever written--my take-down of The Mephisto Covenant by Trinity Faegen, which also doubled as a critique of all the tropes that annoy me in the paranormal romance genre--is also one of the most popular non-Hunger Games related posts I have ever written on this blog. People love to read nasty. People also love to be nasty sometimes, myself included. Sometimes it's hard to know when I've crossed the line from honest into just plain mean, especially when those posts tend to stick around, forever and ever.

It's hard not to compare myself to other people.

There are literally hundreds of book bloggers out there who interview more authors than me, who run more giveaways than me, get more review copies than me, who have far, far, far more followers than me, and most importantly, write more positive reviews than me. On bad days that makes me bitter. On good days, though, I remember that we all have different blogging styles and audiences, and that that is a most excellent thing. The internet would be pretty boring without all of its unique and wonderful and occasionally egregiously awful voices. (And of course, there are the ones that write just as many negative reviews as me and still have more followers/etc., so I try not to read into these things too much.)

I worry that this will affect my writing career.

Writing stories is my passion. It was my passion long before book blogging. And if someone told me I had to give up the book blog tomorrow or lose my chance at a writing career, there's no contest as to which I would pick. Unfortunately, I worry all the time that I'm making that choice already, slowly, but surely. I'm worried that with my negative reviews, I push away the very authors, editors, agents, and publishing folk that I'm seeking to connect with. Isn't book blogging supposed to be fun? When did all this angst get attached?

The good thing? I know I'm not alone.
 
How do I know? Because this post was inspired by the sentiments Pam of Bookalicious, "On reviewing and losing your mojo." Especially after the utter bedlam that ensued after The Story Siren's plagiarism scandal, I think there's a lot of book blogger burnout going around. In fact, in my very unscientific opinion, I think there's a lot of internet burnout going on. People say and do things on the internet that they'd never say and do in real life. Sometimes that's awesome. Sometimes people do stupid sh*t. And we're only just now realizing that, short of a dystopia worthy of a YA novel, this stuff is never going to go away. Your mistakes, your bad days, your bitter disappointments all can haunt you like never before. There are no rules in the wild, wild west of the internet. We're figuring them out as we go along. And the etiquette of negative reviews is a part of that.

So I'm not letting it get me down.

Especially since authors like Beth Revis and Justine Larbalestier have blogged about negative reviews and why they're 100% okay. I'm excited to be a part of this brave new world of books, and all the growing pains that come along with it. Even as the mud is slung and the trenches are dug on the latest major kerfuffle, the YA community remains one of the most supportive, wonderful, truly amazing groups of people I've ever encountered on the internet.

The Moral of the Story: Keep rocking down with your big bad reviewing selves, negative reviews or no negative reviews. Keep it real. Our voices matter. And we're all in it together.

Care to chime in with your own negative review stories, horrifying, wonderful, or otherwise? As always, the comments section is your oyster.

13 comments:

Hannah Doermann said...

You are definitely not alone. I actually like writing bad reviews - I find it easier to explain why I didn't like something than why I did - but sometimes I feel like a bad person, too. I'm always scared someone will go "She didn't like that book!? What's wrong with her? That's my favorite book ever! I'm never reading her blog again." or something like that, even though I know bookish people are awesome and wouldn't think anything like that. Anyways, great post - these are some really good points. I always like knowing I'm not the only one with thoughts like these :)

Charlotte said...

Hmm. I have been reading your blog for ages now, and do not at all have it colored in "negative reviews" in my mind. Certainly not rainbow sparklies of gush either, but simply thoughtful. Not negative. It seems to me that in this blogging business, there's no point in trying to write reviews that aren't what we want to write (within reason, of course). Which is why I don't write many negative reviews--I am too afraid of getting carried away and becoming more snarky than I would want anyone to read!

James V said...

As long as a negative review is an honest review, there should be no hesitation about putting your thoughts out there. Creative people sometimes need to realize that their work might not always be everyone else's cup of tea...

Keri Payton said...

I used to write bad reviews and I was anxious like you. I came off as such a snarky and horrible person, even when I didn't 100% hate the book. Then I evaluated my situation and realised I didn't even like writing bad reviews. I don't sugar-coat my reviews, I just don't write about the books I didn't like. I do let out some of my inner snark when I write my 'A Cynic's Guide' posts, which are very tongue in cheek.

Maggie Desmond-O'Brien said...

I love your reviews, Hannah, so it's nice to know you feel the same way! I'm always worried about burning bridges with people over the books I did and didn't like. But I guess if someone is so offended by an honest review of mine that they're willing to be nasty, then I never really wanted to know that person in the first place.

Maggie Desmond-O'Brien said...

Now that you put it that way, "thoughtful" is probably a better characterization for most of my reviews than negative. But occasionally I do re-read old reviews and am horrified by how snarky and bitter I can come across. The art of the honest review is something I'm still learning, I guess.

(By the way, I'm flattered that you're a longtime reader! I've read and loved your blog for awhile, too.)

Maggie Desmond-O'Brien said...

Honesty is really at the heart of what I'm getting at here. While I have no issues with people who choose to only write honest, positive reviews--the opposite, actually--I have a lot of problems with people who choose to lie and sugarcoat things. Criticism is never an easy thing to take or even to give, but we're all the better for it in the end.

Maggie Desmond-O'Brien said...

There's no point in writing reviews you don't want to write, so good for you! Sounds like you're doing the positive-reviews-only thing exactly right without compromising your honesty, and I really admire that.

And of course, we all have to let out our inner snark sometimes. ;)

Jill Sorenson said...

I'm published and I write negative reviews. I don't feel like a bad person. Negative reviews sell more books than silence.

It can get awkward when I review an author I've met in person or see them at events. I also avoid reviewing romantic suspense (the genre I write in) and stuff my editors have worked on. So, yes, there are stumbling blocks. But my experience has been positive and I try to encourage other authors to review. There's nothing wrong with it. Authors should appreciated the discussions and mentions, period.

ladywriter said...

Do you also write positive reviews?

miriamforster said...

I haven't weighed in really on the reviews issue, (unless you count my Why I am a reader and why it matters post) primarily because I feel like an author who hasn't actually collected any reviews yet doesn't really have the right to say "This is how you should respond."

That said, I do think that book bloggers should be able to discuss books honestly without having the author get personally involved. I think if there's any policing it should be done by the blogger community and not by the author under discussion.

Lord knows you don't need my permission to post negative reviews, but I just wanted to stop in and say I think it's fine to do so. :)

(Also Beth and Justine are super-amazing and I agree with everything they say on this issue)

L. Knight said...

I was thinking about the same thing earlier this week. Great post.

Emma Allison said...

I have a real visceral reaction to people who say bloggers should only do positive reviews. For those who do so, go for it, but being told that my job is to promote books blindly slightly insults me. After all, I buy books based on the reviews of other book bloggers because I know they'll be honest with me. If the bloggers I follow lack a certain transparency, I have a hard time truly believing everything they review is worth my dollar. I don't always expect outright negative reviews, but I need to know the differentiation between a good book and a great one.

Book blogging for me is not about publicity so much as creating a dialogue. Sure, we're a support team for authors and publishers, but that's almost a symptom of the community for me rather than the goal. My mission to spread conversation and help people better understand what they might like to read. That's it. I can't do that if I have a one-note opinion. Not all purely-positive review bloggers are, and for that I am grateful. But for me, coming across as a genuine reader is sharing my opinion - which is sometimes negative. Thanks for the great post!

Share this!

Disqus